EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AWS Fault Injection Service vs Krkn

Krkn

6.7#4 in chaos engineering platformsFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactAWS Fault Injection ServiceKrkn
IntegrationsFIS can be accessed through the AWS Management Console, CLI, SDKs, CloudFormation, and HTTPS API, and its APIs can be used in CI/CD pipelines and custom tooling.The documentation describes integrations with Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Grafana, Slack, S3, and CI/CD systems such as Jenkins and GitHub Actions.
MonitoringFIS supports Amazon CloudWatch metrics for monitoring experiments and shows experiment progress and action details through its console and APIs.Cerberus monitors Kubernetes and OpenShift health and exposes a go/no-go signal, reports, and a metrics API.
PurposeAWS FIS runs fault injection experiments on AWS workloads to help teams improve application performance, observability, and resilience.Krkn injects deliberate failures into Kubernetes clusters to test their resilience.
RollbackFIS supports automatically rolling back or stopping an experiment when specified conditions are met.Krkn’s rollback system persists changes to the filesystem before a scenario so it can restore targeted Kubernetes objects or subsystems.

AWS Fault Injection Service plans

  • AWS Fault Injection Service$0.10, paid once

Krkn plans

  • KrknFree

Pick AWS Fault Injection Service if…

FIS suits teams that want to examine how AWS workloads respond to controlled disruptions. It is especially relevant to teams able to plan experiments carefully and use pre-production before production.

Pick Krkn if…

Krkn suits chaos engineers and teams building resilience testing workflows for Kubernetes or OpenShift. Users need cluster-admin kubeconfig access and Docker 20.10+ or Podman 4.0+; standalone Python use requires Python 3.9 and manual dependency management.

Charts they share