Automic Continuous Delivery Automation
6.5#2 in application lifecycle & release managementWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitAutomic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Keep
What both publish
| Fact | Automic Continuous Delivery Automation | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Broadcom lists Jenkins, Git, Jira, Kubernetes, SAP, and Automic CDA Release Manager among its automation integrations. | Keep lists 110+ providers and describes bidirectional integrations across monitoring, incident response, ticketing, source control, change management, and CMDB systems. |
| Intended users | The product brief describes it as optimized for enterprise environments and intended to empower development and operations. | Keep describes the product as serving teams from small teams managing Prometheus alerts to enterprises connecting many tools and syncing ServiceNow tickets. |
Automic Continuous Delivery Automation plans
- Automic Continuous Delivery AutomationPriced on request
Keep plans
- Growth$199 a month
- Enterprise + AIPriced on request
- Startup—
Pick Automic Continuous Delivery Automation if…
It suits development and operations teams in enterprise environments that need to coordinate deployments and monitor changes across application endpoints. Teams considering release 21.0 should note Broadcom's listed end-of-service date.
Pick Keep if…
Keep suits teams that want to consolidate alerts and automate responses, from small teams to enterprises connecting multiple tools. It offers self-hosted and managed deployment options.