Auconet BICS
5.7#14 in network access control softwareAPISelf-hosted
VisitAuconet BICS vs Foxpass
What both publish
| Fact | Auconet BICS | Foxpass |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Auconet reports that a multi-tenant BICS banking deployment supports monitoring, access control, and compliance with EU banking regulations. | Foxpass states it is certified under ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2, and compliant with GDPR and CCPA. |
| Intended users | Auconet describes BICS as designed for Global 1000-grade IT operations and complex enterprise networks. | Foxpass describes its standalone PKI as suitable for organizations with existing RADIUS servers, MDM certificate enrollment, VPN or VDI certificate authentication, or a need to replace on-premises ADCS. |
| Support | Auconet provides contact by email, phone, or an information request form; a banking case study says two part-time staff handled support requests for hundreds of tenant banks. | Cloud-hosted customers can use in-app console chat, and Foxpass offers setup documentation and a system status page. |
Auconet BICS plans
- Auconet BICSPriced on request
Foxpass plans
- Foxpass Cloud PKI (Standalone)$0.50 a month
- Advanced LicensePriced on request
- Standard LicensePriced on request
Pick Auconet BICS if…
BICS is suited to large enterprises managing complex, mixed-brand networks, including environments shared by multiple tenants. Its SCADA discovery and access controls may also suit organizations managing industrial networks.
Pick Foxpass if…
Foxpass suits organizations seeking certificate- or identity-based authentication for Wi-Fi and VPN access, or hosted directory services for legacy apps and system logins. Its standalone PKI is presented for organizations with existing RADIUS servers, MDM certificate enrollment, VPN or VDI certificate authentication, or a need to replace on-premises ADCS.