EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AssuranceGrid vs CognitiveView

What both publish

FactAssuranceGridCognitiveView
IntegrationsThe maker says built-in evidence connectors for GitHub, Okta, BambooHR, and AWS collect compliance evidence automatically.Listed integrations include AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Databricks, DeepEval, Evidently, AI Fairness 360, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft and OpenTelemetry.
Intended usersAssuranceGrid says it is designed for organizations with small security or compliance teams that need to satisfy customers, auditors, and regulators.The pricing page describes Starter as suited to startups, early AI teams, and first enterprise pilots; Growth targets companies with AI in production and regulated or high-impact use cases.
ProductAssuranceGrid combines AI governance and enterprise GRC in one system of record.CognitiveView describes itself as an AI governance platform for AI risk, compliance, and responsible AI management.
Risk managementIts risk register includes a 5×5 heat map for visualizing inherent and residual risk.Risk management includes a risk taxonomy, heatmaps, portfolio views and customizable categories and scoring.

AssuranceGrid plans

  • Starter$3,000 a year
  • Growth$12,000 a year
  • EnterprisePriced on request

CognitiveView plans

  • FreeFree
  • Standard$8 a year
  • Plus$14 a year
  • AI Governance Starter Pack$149, paid once
  • AI Agent Assurance$10,000, paid once
  • Specialized AI Assurance$10,000, paid once

Pick AssuranceGrid if…

You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.

Pick CognitiveView if…

CognitiveView suits teams that need to inventory AI tools, assess risk, map systems to governance frameworks, and manage approvals or compliance evidence. Its Starter offering is described for startups, early AI teams, and first enterprise pilots, while Growth targets companies with AI in production and regulated or high-impact use cases.

Charts they share