Arivu vs Lawformer
What both publish
| Fact | Arivu | Lawformer |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Arivu describes solutions for law firms and in-house legal teams. | The terms state that the service is intended for business and professional use. |
| Drafting | Arivu drafts using an organization’s prior work product and links suggestions to internal sources or external case law via CourtListener. | It drafts clauses, agreements, and amendments from an organization's templates, precedents, and drafting patterns. |
| Product | Arivu.Legal describes itself as a matter-centric legal intelligence system built inside an organization’s Microsoft 365 tenant. | Lawformer describes itself as AI infrastructure for legal teams that supports work from first draft to signed agreement. |
| Security | Arivu says it uses Entra ID delegated permissions and Microsoft Graph so users can access only files their Microsoft 365 permissions allow. | The security page states that documents and metadata are encrypted in transit with TLS 1.3 and at rest with AES-256, and that customer agreements are not used to train or fine-tune models. |
| Support | The common questions page says its lead architects can join a technical call with a customer’s IT or security team. | The contact page offers customer support by email or a requested call and directs pricing inquiries to its sales contact. |
Arivu plans
No prices published.
Lawformer plans
- Community packageFree
- CorporatePriced on request
Pick Arivu if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Lawformer if…
Lawformer is intended for business and professional use by lawyers and non-lawyers, depending on contract complexity. It suits teams that want contract review, drafting, and repository tools grounded in their organizational materials.