Aqua Container Security
5.9#13 in container image scanning toolsWebLinuxSelf-hostedWindows
VisitAqua Container Security vs Grype
Grype
7.4#3 in software composition analysis softwareFree planFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Aqua Container Security | Grype |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States and Ramat Gan, Israel | Santa Barbara, California, United States |
| Integrations | Listed integrations include AWS Fargate, Azure Container Apps, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, ServiceNow, and AWS Secrets Manager. | The installation documentation provides a Docker image and lists community installation options including Homebrew, MacPorts, Winget, Scoop, and Snapcraft. |
| Risk prioritization | Vulnerabilities are prioritized using contextual factors including exploitability, risk score, severity, and whether workloads are running. | Results can be sorted by severity, EPSS, KEV and risk scoring. |
Aqua Container Security plans
- Cloud SecurityPriced on request
- Dev SecurityPriced on request
- PlatformPriced on request
Grype plans
- GrypeFree
- Grype open-source scannerFree
Pick Aqua Container Security if…
It is intended for teams protecting container-based enterprise workloads across cloud and other listed environments. It may suit teams needing image scanning, runtime controls, and compliance reporting.
Pick Grype if…
Grype suits developers and teams checking packages, images, filesystems, or SBOMs for known vulnerabilities. Its individual-package scanning is also intended for lightweight checks and compliance reviews of specific dependencies.