Apusic Application Server
5.5#16 in application serversWebLinuxSelf-hostedWindows
VisitApusic Application Server vs Phusion Passenger
Phusion Passenger
6.8#2 in application serversFrom $23.52 a yearFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Apusic Application Server | Phusion Passenger |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Shenzhen and Beijing, China | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Security | The maker says AAS uses a microkernel architecture, supports Chinese cryptographic algorithms, and provides real-time security protection. | Passenger says it defends against slow client attacks and common HTTP parser exploits and uses privilege separation. |
| Support | The maker advertises nationwide support with multiple service channels and 24/7 response; standard services include installation guidance, fault diagnosis, and version upgrades. | Support tiers offer between one ticket per year and unlimited tickets, with stated response times ranging from five days to two hours. |
Apusic Application Server plans
- Apusic Application ServerPriced on request
Phusion Passenger plans
- Passenger Enterprise Bronze supportFree
- Passenger Enterprise Silver support$23.52 a year
- Passenger Enterprise Gold support$89.11 a year
- Passenger Enterprise Diamond support$308.19 a year
- Passenger EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Apusic Application Server if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Phusion Passenger if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.