Angos
5.8#32 in container registriesWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitAngos vs JFrog Container Registry
JFrog Container Registry
7.6#1 in container registriesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Angos | JFrog Container Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Access control | CEL policies and optional webhooks control push, pull, and delete access per repository. | The registry includes role-based access control for repositories and artifacts. |
| Integrations | The project README lists Docker Compose and Kubernetes deployment guides, GitHub Actions OIDC setup, and Trivy or Grype scanning. | JFrog advertises more than 100 integrations, including GitHub, Docker, npm, PyPI, ServiceNow, Wiz and Google Artifact Registry. |
Angos plans
No prices published.
JFrog Container Registry plans
- JFrog Container Registry (JCR)Free
- JFrog Container RegistryFree
- Pro$50 a month
- Pro SaaS$150 a month
- Enterprise X$950 a month
- Enterprise X SaaS$950 a month
Pick Angos if…
Angos suits teams operating container registries that want OCI compatibility, repository policies, caching, replication, and image scanning. It supports self-hosted deployments on Linux, macOS, or shared S3 storage.
Pick JFrog Container Registry if…
JCR may suit teams managing container or Helm packages who want self-managed repositories with access controls and search. The free edition is limited to self-managed use and excludes several capabilities, including Xray and high availability.