EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Amazon FSx for Lustre vs Google Cloud Managed Lustre

What both publish

FactAmazon FSx for LustreGoogle Cloud Managed Lustre
Compute integrationsAWS lists integrations with Amazon EC2, Amazon EKS, Amazon SageMaker, AWS Batch, and AWS ParallelCluster.Instances can be mounted by Compute Engine virtual machines and Google Kubernetes Engine applications.
PerformanceAWS states that it offers up to 1200 Gbps per-client throughput with Elastic Fabric Adapter and NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage, millions of IOPS, and sub-millisecond latencies.The service supports throughput up to 10 TBps and storage capacity up to 84,016,000 GiB (80.1 PiB).
SecurityAll file systems are encrypted at rest; in-transit encryption is available in select regions, and VPC security groups can control network access.Data stored in a Managed Lustre file system is encrypted at rest, and data in transit to and within Google Cloud is encrypted.

Amazon FSx for Lustre plans

  • Intelligent-Tiering (elastic) storage class—
  • SSD or HDD (provisioned) storage class—

Google Cloud Managed Lustre plans

  • Dynamic (25 MB/s/TB)Free
  • Dynamic (25 MB/s/TiB)$0.06 a month
  • 125 MB/s/TiB$0.15 a month
  • 250 MB/s/TiB$0.21 a month
  • 500 MB/s/TiB$0.34 a month
  • 1000 MB/s/TiB$0.60 a month

Pick Amazon FSx for Lustre if…

You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.

Pick Google Cloud Managed Lustre if…

It suits teams running HPC simulations, modeling and analysis, or machine-learning workloads that need a parallel file system. It is designed for users who can provision capacity and mount instances to Google Cloud compute services.

Charts they share