AI Code Reviewer
6.8#17 in ai code review toolsFree planFree planLinuxSelf-hosted
VisitAI Code Reviewer vs Sourcery
What both publish
| Fact | AI Code Reviewer | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Custom rules | A Markdown rules_file can add repository-specific coding guidelines, and it is read from the base branch. | Users can define project-wide review rules in a .sourcery.yaml file and use public rulesets such as the Google Python Style Guide. |
| Integrations | Documented OpenAI-compatible examples include DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, Together, Groq, vLLM and LM Studio through a configurable base URL. | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Jira |
| Rating on G2 | 4.9 out of 5 from 5 reviews, but the G2 page identifies the product vendor as CodeAnt AI rather than xiaofuqing13. | 3.5 out of 5 from 5 reviews |
AI Code Reviewer plans
- FreeFree
Sourcery plans
- Open SourceFree
- Pro$12 a month
- Team$24 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick AI Code Reviewer if…
This free, MIT-licensed project suits teams looking for self-hosting, a choice of model providers, and control over code privacy. It is intended for teams using GitHub pull requests and Actions.
Pick Sourcery if…
Sourcery may suit developers and teams seeking automated pull request reviews and security checks across supported Git hosts. Its IDE extension and deployment options also serve users who want code review within their development workflow.