Adobe Stock
8.2#4 in stock photo websitesAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAdobe Stock vs PIXTA
What both publish
| Fact | Adobe Stock | PIXTA |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial assets | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 1982 | 2005 |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Headquarters | San Jose, California, USA | Tokyo, Japan |
| Illustration assets | Yes | Yes |
| Monthly downloads | 10 | 3 |
| Vector assets | Yes | Yes |
Adobe Stock plans
- 10 standard assets—
- 10 standard assetsPriced on request
- 25 standard assetsPriced on request
- 25 standard assets—
- 40 standard assetsPriced on request
- 40 standard assets—
PIXTA plans
- 3 images/month — annual renewal$15 a month
- 3 images/month — monthly renewal$30 a month
- 10 images/month — annual renewal$29 a month
- 10 images/month — monthly renewal$49 a month
- 20 images/month — annual renewal$49 a month
- 20 images/month — monthly renewal$75 a month
Pick Adobe Stock if…
Adobe Stock may suit individuals and organizations looking for licensable creative assets, including teams that need pooled licenses. Its API and Creative Cloud integration may also be relevant to users building asset workflows.
Pick PIXTA if…
PIXTA may suit individuals or teams looking for vector, illustration, or editorial assets online. The free plan is a fit for buyers who need no more than three downloads per month.