EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

AccessOne vs Aryaka SD-WAN

What both publish

FactAccessOneAryaka SD-WAN
AudienceThe page positions Prime for branches and VMs, Enterprise for HQ and data centers, and Shared MTGE for MSP and wholesale use.Aryaka positions its service for enterprises modernizing global networks, replacing MPLS, connecting cloud applications, or supporting distributed users.
DeploymentIt runs on commodity x86 hardware and cloud VMs on AWS, Azure and GCP, managed from one dashboard.Aryaka describes zero-touch provisioning and site deployments ranging from hours to days.
Founded20242009
IntegrationsThe platform page names Grafana, VictoriaMetrics, and Loki for per-flow visibility, and AWS, Azure, and GCP for cloud VMs.Aryaka lists partner solution briefs involving Alibaba Cloud, Microsoft Azure Virtual WAN, Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Zoom, WebEx, Salesforce, and Microsoft 365/Teams.
SecurityThe security architecture includes default-deny zero-trust policies, MQTT control-plane mTLS and a unique X.509 certificate for each edge device.Secure SD-WAN includes stateful firewalling, micro-segmentation, zone firewalls, cloud connectors, and IPsec encryption.
SupportThe Shared MTGE tier lists a dedicated support channel.Aryaka describes the service as including proactive monitoring and 24×7 managed service.

AccessOne plans

  • AccessOne EnterprisePriced on request
  • AccessOne PrimePriced on request
  • Shared MTGEPriced on request

Aryaka SD-WAN plans

  • Aryaka Advanced SecurityPriced on request
  • Aryaka SD-WANPriced on request
  • Aryaka Unified SASEPriced on request

Pick AccessOne if…

AccessOne Prime is positioned for branches and cloud or on-premises VMs, while Enterprise is intended for headquarters and data centers. Shared MTGE is aimed at MSP and wholesale operators managing 10 or more tenants.

Pick Aryaka SD-WAN if…

Aryaka SD-WAN is positioned for enterprises modernizing global networks, replacing MPLS, connecting cloud applications, or supporting distributed users. Its managed service and web portal may suit organizations seeking centralized networking oversight.

Charts they share