Reek
6.1#17 in lintersFree planFree planLinux
VisitReek vs Ruff
What both publish
| Fact | Reek | Ruff |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Reek supports a `.reek.yml` configuration file and permits smell warnings to be suppressed with source code comments. | Ruff supports configuration through pyproject.toml, ruff.toml, or .ruff.toml. |
| Editor integrations | The README lists integrations for Vim, TextMate, Atom, SublimeLinter, VS Code, and Emacs. | The setup guide documents integrations including VS Code, Sublime Text, PyCharm, and Zed. |
| Installation | The README says to install Reek with RubyGems using `gem install reek`. | Ruff can be installed using uv, pip, pipx, standalone installers, and package managers including Homebrew and Conda. |
| Notable limit | Reek says it cannot provide generic fixes for reported smells because fixes depend on domain language and business logic. | Ruff does not support custom or third-party lint rules. |
| Purpose | Reek examines Ruby classes, modules, and methods and reports code smells. | Ruff is a Python linter and code formatter written in Rust. |
Reek plans
- ReekFree
Ruff plans
- RuffFree
Pick Reek if…
It suits Ruby developers and teams that want configurable code-smell reports in editors, Rails projects, or CI workflows. Its formats and integrations support varied development setups.
Pick Ruff if…
Ruff suits Python developers who want linting, formatting, and automatic fixes in one tool. It may also suit teams using supported editors, CI integrations, or pre-commit hooks.